Monday, July 29, 2013

The Infomercial Church




Recently we upgraded our satellite TV package.  This was made necessary by a variety of factors not the least of which was bringing BBC America into our home in advance of the 50th Anniversary Dr. Who special (there were other factors but we shall not digress).

What I am here to observe is this: I did not think it possible that there could be even more television shopping channels than the ones already on the system.  Easily a third (or more) of our stations are dedicated to phone-in shopping.

It is a deplorable trend on such stations--and infomercials in general--that the preposterous use of language has become common.  More specifically, I am reflecting on all of the "free" products that cost money.

We have all heard it-- "And if you act now we will send you a second widget absolutely free--just pay shipping and handling"  These fees vary but I have seen S&H fees up to 19.95.

This is not free.  This is an item that costs 19.95.

Now we might dismiss all of this as being on the sort of showmanship made popular by the traveling snake oil salesmen.  Let the buyer beware.  Etc.

And yet these seemingly silly things come at a cost.  Like a tiny fountain pen in the laundry, the stain of this insidious language soon stains the whole of the landscape.

Most specifically I am thinking of the Church--Protestant churches mainly.  The Roman Church has always been pretty up front about the fees associate with salvation.  Most recently a discount on fees was offered by Pope Francis for following him on Twitter.  The Roman Church has never fudged around.  Salvation is not possible outside of the Church and if you want it you have to WORK for it.  Mass isn't optional people!  We are keeping track of the works!  You need to be lighting candles and offering prayers and DOING YOUR PART!  THIS AIN'T FREE YOU KNOW!

Ah, but it is... say the Reformers.  Listen to Paul, Luther intoned.  By grace we are saved through faith.  The Reformation, taking issue with a number of things, including indulgences, wanted to take back the Gospel from the industry of Rome and return to the simple notion of grace and faith.  It was Calvin's understanding that whatever "good works" we might do are done--not in fear of hell or the absence of heaven--but in gratitude for what Christ as already achieved on the cross.  No hidden fees.  Just grace.  Faith.  Gratitude.

But the centuries have eroded these ideals (if, in fact, they were ever truly present).  Today churches claiming the DNA of 16th century protests have crept back into the realm of the infomercial.  Grace is free, they say, just pay shipping.  Handling.  Processing.  These fees take the form of judgment upon the lifestyles, orientations, social standing, economic standing, and marital standing of many.  Many of these fees are "hidden" fees in that they are never explicitly mentioned but, after having spent some time in such churches as an "outsider", one begins to understand that all the fees have not been paid.

In their book "If Grace is True", Philp Gulley and James Mulholland write:

Salvation comes with believing God loves you unconditionally.  It is abandoning the misconception that you are rejected because of your bad behavior or accepted because of your goodness.  Only when we repent of this self-absorption and focus on God's love can love alter us.  Then and only then can God transform hearts darkened by sin and soften hearts hardened by self-righteousness. (pg. 151)

Or, as Paul Tillich wrote some sixty years prior:

Sometimes a wave of light breaks into our darkness, and it is as though a voice were saying: "You are accepted, accepted by that which is greater than you, and the name of which you do not know.  Do not aks for the name now; perhaps you will find it later.  Do not try to do anything now; perhaps later you will do much.  Do not seek for anything; do not perform anything; do not intend anything.  Simply accept the fact that you are accepted.  If that happens to us, we experience grace. (The Shaking of the Foundations: pg 162)

Grace is not "sold on the market as cheap jack's ware" (Bonhoeffer).  What's free is free.  And grace is free and it is freedom.  No hidden fees, no shipping and processing.  No ifs, ands, or buts.  No exclusions apply.  It is available in all areas. 

And as we have invoked Bonhoeffer in the last paragraph, we will acknowledge, with Bonhoeffer, that grace that is free is still grace that is costly.  But not in the manner in which many churches today peddle it.  The Church, if it is to be the Church of Christ, should not be where you order and pay for free grace.  It should be the place to celebrate it, share it, and live it.


Saturday, July 27, 2013

Prayer




Luke 11:1-13

The impulse to prayer is universal.  Not as a constant thing but in those moments when human beings feel a need to relate to some thing or some one outside themselves.  It may be a moment of sudden panic, when the professor pops a quiz covering unread assignments.  It may be a moment of awe when one is stunned by the beauty of power and nature, or at a time when relief and gratitude need to be expressed.
            But if the impulse to pray is universal, so also must be the question, “Does it really matter?”  “Does prayer really change things?”  It is a question that cries out to be answered, for there are almost as many theories about prayer as there are those who pray, as many claims as there are those urging us to pray.
            I have only to remember persons I have known who have been persuaded to pray with the promise that whatever they desired would come to them as a result.  One man in particular cannot be forgotten.  He was not a church member, nor had he shown any interest in the church or belief until his wife became ill.  Some friends of hers persuaded him that prayer would save her life; so he threw himself desperately and passionately into praying for her.  Yet even as he prayed, she died, leaving him not only grieving but also bitterly angry with a God who, he concluded, let him down.
            Even more numerous must be those who, impressed by the regularity of the universe and by the conclusions of science, relegate prayer to a by gone era when we did not understand how  things worked in the world.  These are the ones who point to the “indisputable facts of history”, conflict upon conflict, a tale of warfare and suffering little influenced by the countless prayers of the faithful for peace and understanding on earth.  “The Church,” they argue, “has been praying for a new spirit within humanity and between nations and races for generations.  See how little things have changed?”
            Does prayer really change things?  This is one of the most serious questions.  It strikes at the very heart of faith.  And there is a sense in which we need to come clean, admitting that prayer has sometimes been held out as a form of magic, a technique to manipulate a higher power, to secure favors when favors were badly needed.  So when the question is put, “Does prayer really change things?” we must be honest and compassionate enough to answer, “No, not if by that question you mean that we can order God to change circumstances and make everything, no matter how trivial, more to our liking.”
            Certainly not in the sense of the prayer found among the papers of one John Ward, Member of Parliament, some years ago.  “O Lord, thou knowest I have mine estates in the city of London, and likewise that I have recently purchased an estate in the fee simple in the county of Essex.  I beseech thee to preserve the two counties of Middlesex and Essex from fire and earthquake, and as I have a mortgage in Hertfordshire, I beg of thee likewise to have an eye of compassion on that county; for the rest of the counties, thou mayest deal with them as thou art pleased.”  (For whatever you make of it, theologically or otherwise, I am told that John Ward died in debtor’s prison.)
            These things must be said, not to be unkind but so as not to be misunderstood.  Nothing is more central in our growth as persons than the way in which we understand our relationship to God in Christ, which is to say how we understand prayer.
            For whatever reason, and there are many, it has been tempting for us to think of prayer in a mechanical sense or pattern, probably because it seems normal for us to think in terms of cause and effect.  So prayer comes to be understood on the model, perhaps, of an electronic teller machine, from which, if you have the right card and remember the correct number, you can secure money.  Then prayer becomes a matter of technique or of the right credentials.
            Or perhaps we have come to think of prayer in terms of negotiating.  If you can come up with the right offer, then a deal can be made.  Hence prayers in which we attempt to bargain with God, giving up this or that, or offering to do this or that if by that action God can be persuaded to give something we want in return.
            But neither the mechanical nor the magical nor the negotiating model is the way in which Jesus thought of prayer, and it is only as we enter into his understanding that we can appreciate what he meant when he spoke to his disciples about prayer.
            Jesus knew God in terms of personal relationship.  He spoke of his “heavenly father” with whom prayer was communication, not technique.
            Now it is true that we have become fairly successful in transforming personal relationships into mechanical ones, as when the teenager assures her friend, “Don’t worry, I’ll be able to go.  I will wait until the ball game comes on TV, and then I will ask my dad if I should practice my piano lesson, or can I come over to your house.”
            All too often relationships are reduced to the level of barter, as when a wife confesses, “I put up with what he wants, because then I know that I can get what I want.”
            Contrast these with truly personal relationships based on vulnerability, caring, and love.  Jesus always approached God in prayer as approaching a loving father to whom he could pour out his heart, knowing he would be heard and understood.
            But you can’t always predict what love may require.  It is not a simple formula to be followed or a response that can be programmed.  Sometimes love must be tough and sometimes gentle.  But it isn’t abstract, and it isn’t easy.  And in this kind of personal relationship, communication, the art of speaking together, is a very important thing.
            Do you remember Tevye, the father in “Fiddler on the Roof”?  Complaining to God, fighting with God, wanting to know why it would have been so difficult for God to have made him a wealthy man instead of a poor man?  Yet with it all, in spite of the lack of formality, there was a sense of honest communication, of affection.  There was a personal relationship.  So with Jesus who was able to pray “Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me….”
            Here is a young man who is counting on his father to finance his college education.  His father had let him know that he is more than willing, even anxious to make that commitment for his son, but that he expected his son to make good use of the opportunity.  A phrase that obviously meant different things to different people, because the son partied through the first semester, making it a disaster academically, and the father was reluctant to subsidize that kind of career.  So there came a time of crisis when the subject of the second semester could no longer be avoided.  But as they talked, and as the son’s anger passed, and the father’s too, it began to dawn upon the son that his father actually meant what he had said, and that it was out of love that he was speaking.  Though it wasn’t easy, and it didn’t happen just like that, a change did come over the son, and his father began to talk with him about regaining academic standing and continuing his education.  Father and son were now involved at a different level, and both were able to respond to the other in ways that had not seemed possible before.
            Perhaps to someone who believed that a deal was a deal, the father should have stood his ground, and the son should have learned his lesson the harder way.  But the father saw the beginning of change in his son, and he was able to change his own approach to meet that growth and to encourage it.
            That’s the way love is.  And prayer.  Prayer doesn’t simply change things to suit our fancy, but it does bring us into God’s presence and that may change you and it may change me and it may make it possible for God to act in ways which were not open before.  Prayer may not change a situation so that it will be more to our liking.  It may not remove barriers, but it may open us to God’s effective love in such a way that the barriers are no longer as formidable as we thought.  Prayer may not do away with problems, but it may enlarge us to the place where we can contend with problems.  Prayer may not drop a new job in our lap, but it may enable us to grow in ways that change that whole picture too.  And surely we pray for others, and others pray for us, in intercessory prayer that is not a technique for changing God’s mind or calling his attention to something that he should have done long ago, had he been paying attention.  Intercessory prayer is a way in which we place ourselves in a relationship of cooperation with God, sharing our concerns, opening ourselves, if we dare, to new insights, new impulses, new possibilities through which God can work, that were not open to God before.  Who can pray to God for others and then not do all he or she can to come to the aid of those others himself?  Very risky, this business of taking our concerns for others to God, for we ourselves may well be changed.
            That is always the risk when we take God seriously, when we persistently call upon him, with the same sense of urgency and need as the man who desperately needed bread in the middle of the night.  We can’t program God’s response.  We can’t pass off our problems on him to get us off the hook.  We can’t manipulate or bargain.  But we can come honestly to a heavenly father, who in love responds.  It may not change things, but it may sure change us.  That is the risk, and the possibility and the glory of prayer.  Amen.

Monday, July 15, 2013

A Tale of Two Teenagers







This morning I find myself reflecting on the fate of two different teenagers. Both were shot because their assailant believed them to be a threat. One survived and spoke recently at the United Nations. The other is dead. In the case of the first teenager, her assailant is universally condemned as a terrorist. In the second case the assailant was acquitted in a court of law and is a free man. It is a confusing world full of seemingly infinite interests and presumptions colliding like particles. Fate and circumstance navigate a razor thin line.What is the difference between Malala Yousafzai and Trayvon Marton?  The greatest difference is life itself. Malala has voice. Trayvon does not. I hope Malala's voice might rise on behalf of Trayvon and others for Malala advocates for education for all and it is my belief that the way out of this increasingly hostile social environment is education....the triumph over ignorance and fear and the gestation of true empathy and thoughtfulness.
But more specifics are needed.  For "education" is a wide net, and surely many highly educated individuals have contributed to some of the greatest injustices in our history.
There is no perfect solution to be sure.  And we are talking about something here that is so primordial, so deep within the mystery of human society that simple answers dissolve like cotton candy.
Perhaps there is a relationship, however, between the increasingly cruel and hostile environment in which we live and the corresponding decline in the humanities and liberal arts?  It is widely documented that the humanities are in decline in our colleges and universities.  Historically mocked for their "impracticality", degrees in philosophy, English, religion, music, theater and the like are now more than ever seen as superfluous and irrelevant.
What makes this particularly frightening is that these disciplines are the disciplines which take seriously the core realities of our current malaise.  Where else in the curriculum are we to delve deeply and uncomfortably into such topics as sin and so eagerly and hopefully into topics like redemption and transcendence?
What afflicts us today is what has afflicted us through the ages: sin.  And please do not think of sin as an exclusively "Christian" idea. Certainly sin is in the bible and certainly Christians speak of sin.  But Christianity has no monopoly on sin.  Sin is discussed centuries--millennia--before the Christian New Testament.
If we want to understand sin we cannot find it in mathematical or scientific textbooks.  We must seek it in poetry, art, literature, legend, myth, art, music, and drama.  Sin is identified and examined in the artistic imaginations of the seeking in every time and culture.  Correspondingly, redemption is experienced in the same way, in the same places.  And so it is with all of the aspects of our human condition that matter the most--those that contribute to life and justice--or death and injustice.
The recently released "official music video", "I Am Malala", is a moving expression of hope.  Young girls of the world sing and celebrate Malala's message of infinite hope.  Although no video yet exists (to my knowledge) there are no doubt many young black teenagers who would also cry "I am Trayvon".  Figures like Malala and Trayvon become mythical in their symbolic power to represent the ongoing struggle with injustice for many people.
But what solution there may be to our downward spiral rests not only with the identification with the victim, but also the perpetrator.  When King David stole Bathsheba from Uriah and summarily orchestrated Uriah's death, it was the prophet Nathan that came to David with a story.  That story of injustice culminated with David's anger kindled at the perpetrator.  Nathan then sprung the trap.  "You are the man!"  David, by identifying with the injustice in a story ostensibly not about him, became able to see his role in injustice as part of his own "story".
This is the power of story.  This is the power of art.  This is the power of music.  This is the power of drama. The story is the vehicle by which we move into solidarity with the victim and the perpetrator, the hero and the villain.  We are Oedipus who struggles heroically to save Thebes only to realize he is its fall.  We are Scrooge whose reclamation must be preceded by the painful acknowledgement of loss.  We are Jesus with our desire to love but we are also Pilate with our hands in the bowl.  We are Malala and we are Trayvon.  But we are also George and we are also the Taliban.
Without the ongoing influence of the humanities we will continue in the destructive path of the polarized either/or.  Only the empathy of the both/and can save us.  And that is what I mean by education.  If empathy can be said to be cultivated anywhere beyond our own experience it has to be in and through our exposure to, and engagement with, the great imaginative artistic works of the human condition.